- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Emergency operation for spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma in a patient with severe back pain, which made it difficult to evaluate neurological deficits: a case report
JA Clinical Reportsvolume 5, Article number: 25 (2019)
To the editor
Spontaneous spinal epidural hematomas (SSEH) are relatively rare and are generally characterized by sudden back pain followed by neurological deficits [1,2,3]. In some patients without neurological deficits, diagnosing SSEH is difficult. We discuss a patient with SSEH with severe back pain, which made it difficult to evaluate neurological deficits, in the emergency room (ER).
A 70-year-old woman, 157-cm tall and weighing 40 kg, experienced acute back pain upon waking and called emergency medical services. Her medical history included only hypertension, for which she was taking 10-mg manidipine hydrochloride each morning and no anticoagulants. On presentation, her consciousness level was clear, blood pressure 176/93 mmHg, heart rate 120 beats/min, SpO2 100%, and respiratory rate 30 breaths/min. Abdominal ultrasonography did not indicate abnormal findings, and blood biochemical parameters, including coagulation tests, were normal. Although manual motor testing was difficult to perform because of the patient’s severe back pain, no obvious neurological deficits were confirmed. The patient’s pain numerical rating score was 9–10; therefore, we administered 600 mg of acetaminophen and inserted a 25-mg diclofenac suppository. Twenty hours after onset, her back pain had almost disappeared, but she had developed weakness in her lower extremities (Table 1) and sensory disorder in the lower umbilical region. We performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) immediately, which showed compression of the posterior aspect of the spinal cord by a hematoma extending from T10–L1 (Fig. 1). Emergency evacuation of the hematoma, T10–T12 total laminectomy, and L1 laminotomy were performed immediately. Her postoperative course was good, and she was discharged from the hospital 17 days postoperatively without complications.
SSEHs are difficult to diagnose in patients without apparent neurological deficits , and severe back pain makes it difficult to detect subtle neurological findings. The incidence of SSEH is 0.1 per 100,000 individuals  and is 1.4 times higher in men than in women . One of the possible risks of SSEH is uncontrolled hypertension . Hypertension was present in our patient, and although her blood pressure was high at admission because of the severe back pain, her blood pressure was usually well controlled. Generally, most cases of SSEH are idiopathic .
The most common treatment for SSEH in patients with neurological deficits is surgical evacuation of the hematoma [8, 9]. The mortality rate associated with this operation is low ; therefore, surgical evacuation of the hematoma should be the first choice for SSEH with neurological deficits. In our patient, severe back pain masked neurological deficits, making it difficult to diagnose SSEH. Additionally, pain-related symptoms, including a high respiratory rate, make assessing neurological findings confusing. We considered operation instead of conservative treatment because of the progression of our patient’s neurological deficits and the size of the hematoma seen on MRI.
Acute back pain is a common symptom in the ER, and mild neurological deficits may not be recognized at presentation with concurrent severe back pain. MRI is the most useful method to diagnose SSEH, and surgical intervention provides a good neurological prognosis.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma
Groen RJ, Ponssen H. The spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. A study of the etiology. J Neurol Sci. 1990;98:121–38.
Yu JX, Liu J, He C, Sun LY, Xiang SS, Ma YJ, et al. Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: a study of 55 cases focused on the etiology and treatment strategy. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:546–54.
Groen RJ, van Alphen HA. Operative treatment of spontaneous spinal epidural hematomas: a study of the factors determining postoperative outcome. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:494–508.
Messerer M, Dubourg J, Diabira S, Robert T, Hamlat A. Spinal epidural hematoma: not always an obvious diagnosis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012;19:2–8.
Holtås S, Heiling M, Lönntoft M. Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: findings at MR imaging and clinical correlation. Radiology. 1996;199:409–13.
Spengos K, Tsivgoulis G, Zakopoulos N. Could high blood pressure be the cause of acute spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma? Eur J Emerg Med. 2007;14:59.
Aksay E, Kiyan S, Yuruktumen A, Kitis O. A rare diagnosis in emergency department: spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:835.e3–5.
Matsumura A, Namikawa T, Hashimoto R, Okamoto T, Yanagida I, Hoshi M, et al. Clinical management for spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: diagnosis and treatment. Spine J. 2008;8:534–7.
Börm W, Mohr K, Hassepass U, Richter HP, Kast E. Spinal hematoma unrelated to previous surgery: analysis of 15 consecutive cases treated in a single institution within a 10-year period. Spine. 2004;29:555–61.
Liao CC, Lee ST, Hsu WC, Chen LR, Lui TN, Lee SC. Experience in the surgical management of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(1 Suppl Spine):38–45.
We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, and Jane Charbonneau, DVM, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval is not applicable, and consent to participate was obtained from the patient.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.