- Case report
- Open access
- Published:
Successful intraoperative management of laparoscopic hysterectomy in a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome: a case report
JA Clinical Reports volume 10, Article number: 17 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Patients with Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) requiring noncardiac surgery are at a significantly high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, perioperative management of patients with ES requiring laparoscopic surgery remains unclear.
Case presentation
We describe the case of a patient with ES who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy under general anesthesia with a peripheral nerve block. The objectives of the perioperative management included the following: (1) maintaining systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output through euvolemia, facilitated by the infusion of noradrenaline, and (2) preventing a reduction in oxygen-carrying capacity and factors that elevate pulmonary vascular resistance, such as pain, hypoxia, and decreased body temperature. Although laparoscopic procedures involved an increased risk in patients with ES, they are less invasive than open surgeries.
Conclusion
This report describes the successful anesthetic management of a patient with ES, ensuring a balance between systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance.
Background
Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) is a complex combination of cardiovascular abnormalities characterized by pulmonary hypertension at the systemic pressure level with a reversed or bidirectional shunt through intracardiac or aortopulmonary communication [1].
The mortality rate among patients with ES undergoing noncardiac surgery is as high as 3.8–30% [2, 3], and indications for surgery and anesthesia are limited [4]. During perioperative management, preventing an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and maintaining systemic vascular resistance (SVR) are essential [4]. This report describes our experience with anesthetic management of a patient with ES who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy under general anesthesia with a peripheral nerve block.
Case presentation
A 34-year-old woman with ES was scheduled for laparoscopic total hysterectomy due to heavy bleeding during menstruation. Her weight, height, and body mass index were 73.3 kg, 1.62 m, and 28 kg/m2, respectively. She had a small ventricular septal defect at birth and was diagnosed with ES at the age of 7. She subsequently presented with severely limited exercise tolerance and began taking phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, prostacyclin receptor agonists, and endothelin receptor antagonists. In addition, she received home oxygen therapy. At 31 years of age, she was diagnosed with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Further, laboratory assessment revealed a mild prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time. Since then, she had been hospitalized several times for hemoptysis and heavy menstrual bleeding.
Upon presentation to our hospital, the patient was in shock with a heart rate of 75–90 beats per minute (bpm) and arterial pressure of 86/54 mmHg due to severe bleeding. She developed progressive tachypnea; the oxygen saturation (SpO2) was around 80% during oxygen (O2) therapy using a simple face mask at a flow rate of 5 L/min. The laboratory findings were as follows: hematocrit level, 31.5%; platelet count, 10,000/µL; and activated partial thromboplastin time, 90.7 s. Arterial blood gas analysis yielded the following findings: pH, 7.445; PaO2, 47.8 mmHg; PaCO2, 29.3 mmHg; HCO3−, 19.7 mEq/L; and base excess, −3.5 mmol/L, with an O2 flow rate 5 L/min via a simple face mask. The patient also developed progressively worsening hypoxemia and cyanosis. After admission, she received a blood transfusion of red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma, as well as intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. The perioperative team and her relatives discussed the risks of anesthesia and surgery and also considered nonsurgical management. Despite the related risks, a consensus was reached that hysterectomy was the best treatment alternative.
The patient underwent thorough preoperative assessment, including 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), full blood count, hepatic and renal function assessment, coagulation screening, and arterial blood gas analysis. Chest radiography revealed cardiomegaly, central pulmonary artery dilation, and disappearance of peripheral pulmonary vascular shadows. ECG revealed a sinus rhythm with right axis deviation and right ventricular hypertrophy. TTE demonstrated good left ventricular function; however, there was systolic displacement of the interventricular septum into the left ventricle, indicating right ventricular pressure overload. The peak gradient of tricuspid regurgitation increased markedly to 118 mmHg. The interventricular septum had a defect with a bidirectional shunt. Post-blood transfusion, blood values included the following: preoperative hemoglobin, 12.9 g/dl; hematocrit, 40.9%; platelet count, 101,000/µL; and activated partial thromboplastin time, 59.6 s.
A gynecologist recommended laparoscopy over open hysterectomy. Laparoscopic surgery involved a risk of exacerbation of the right heart failure due to changes in venous return and increased PVR due to pneumoperitoneum. Nevertheless, it was selected due to its benefits of minimal invasiveness, light pain, and faster recovery. We were prepared to switch to laparotomy if hemodynamics became unmanageable post-insufflation.
General anesthesia with peripheral nerve block was scheduled without any premedication. We used standard monitoring: ECG, pulse oximetry, end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2), noninvasive blood pressure, and bispectral index monitor (BIS™, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). A radial artery catheter was inserted before anesthesia, and the FloTrac sensor® (ver.4.00, Edwards Lifesciences, LLC) were attached. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) were evaluated using the HemoSphere monitor. Rapid anesthesia induction was achieved using 0.2 mg/kg of remimazolam, 100 µg of fentanyl, 50 mg of rocuronium, and continuous remifentanil infusion at 0.15 μg/kg/min. After tracheal intubation, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and central venous catheterization were performed. Additionally, rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks were administered for postoperative analgesia. Noradrenaline infusion at 0.02 μg/kg/min was started after the peripheral nerve block. Anesthesia was maintained using 1% sevoflurane and remifentanil up to 0.25 μg/kg/min, with bolus administration of rocuronium, as required.
The ventilation mode was pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed (PCV-VG). Here, the target parameters were as follows: expired tidal volume, 6 mL/kg; inspiration-to-expiration ratio, 1:2; FiO2, 0.8 with air; positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), 5 cmH2O; and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), ≤ 25 cmH2O. The PETCO2 was maintained at 35–40 mmHg by adjusting the respiratory rate (RR). Intra-abdominal pressure during pneumoperitoneum was maintained at ≤ 8 mmHg, with a head down tilt of 15° being allowed.
There were no acute episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, or arrhythmias during anesthesia induction or maintenance. Pneumoperitoneum or changing the patient’s position from supine to the head down position had no significant effect (Fig. 1). During pneumoperitoneum establishment, arterial blood gas analysis yielded normal findings (Table 1); blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged, with the CI remaining at approximately 3.8 L/min/m2. Blood loss was 20 mL; accordingly, intraoperative blood transfusion was not required. The durations of surgery and anesthesia were 95 min and 183 min, respectively. The patient was subsequently extubated in the operating room.
The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and could breathe spontaneously through a face mask with an O2 flow rate of up to 6 L/min; SpO2 was generally maintained at ≥ 90%. No episodes of hypotension occurred during the postoperative period. The patient received fentanyl infusion for 12 h at 25–50 µg/h. Analgesia was supplemented with intravenous acetaminophen. Oral administration of pulmonary vasodilators was resumed immediately on the day of surgery. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged 6 days postoperatively.
Discussion
The primary goal of anesthetic management in patients with ES is to maintain SVR, minimize increases in PVR, and provide adequate analgesia [4]. Laparoscopic surgery causes unique hemodynamic and ventilatory effects [5], but it is less invasive and has a smaller effect on postoperative hemodynamics. Thus, it may be beneficial for patients with ES if appropriate anesthesia management is performed.
Changes in hemodynamics caused by abdominal insufflation include increase in MAP, SVR, and CVP and decrease in CO [5]. Among these, increased MAP and SVR may be advantageous in managing anesthesia for patients with ES. On the other hand, excessive preload on the right heart system and decreased CO can lead to a shunt crisis. However, regarding CO, the Trendelenburg position and intra-abdominal pressure below 15 mmHg can prevent a decrease in CO after abdominal insufflation [5]. The desufflation phase of laparoscopic surgery has the opposite effect to the insufflation phase on hemodynamics. To visualize these hemodynamic changes, we used the FloTrac sensor®, TEE, and central venous catheters. By monitoring, we confirmed stable hemodynamics throughout the entire surgery that progressed as expected from preoperative estimates. However, a decrease in ScvO2 was observed after extubation, which was thought to be caused by a decrease in SaO2 and an increase in oxygen consumption. Fortunately, hemodynamic failure did not occur; however, it is necessary to extubate patients with ES more carefully. Continuous ScvO2 measurement may also be desirable for longer or more invasive surgeries in patients with ES.
There are several reports on the continuous administration of noradrenaline to maintain systemic blood pressure in anesthesia management of patients with ES [6]. Noradrenaline, with α- and mild β-adrenergic activity, minimally affects heart rate and boosts CO [7]. It was also useful in maintaining CO and systolic blood pressure during anesthesia in this patient. Because excessive afterload leads to a decrease in CO, continuous administration of noradrenaline was stopped immediately before the end of surgery, but no significant decrease in systolic blood pressure was observed. Sammut et al. reported continuous administration of noradrenaline at 0.03–0.1 µg/kg/min during surgery and 0.03 µg/kg/min for 20 h postoperatively [6]. This patient received a continuous administration of 0.02 µg/kg/min during surgery, and we judged it unnecessary after surgery, although careful observation was still necessary.
Increased PVR can precipitate a shunt crisis. In particular, laparoscopic surgery can lead to hypoxemia and hypercarbia in patients with ES, requiring careful respiratory management. Therefore, ventilator management of patients with ES should emphasize higher FiO2, hyperventilation, PEEP < 15 mmHg (preferably between 5 and 10 cmH2O), and maintenance of the lung volume at a normal functional residual capacity [8]. To achieve this, our patient was intubated and received positive-pressure ventilation. The PCV-VG ventilation mode resulted in a decrease PIP and increased dynamic compliance compared to the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode [9]. However, positive-pressure ventilation can suppress venous return, so early tracheal extubation was performed in the operating room.
Excessive tone of the sympathetic nervous system due to pain can cause an increase in SVR and PVR, followed by destabilization hemodynamics. Therefore, appropriate analgesia in the perioperative period is important. We administered multimodal analgesia including peripheral nerve block and were able to obtain sufficient postoperative analgesia. Peripheral nerve blocks can diminish the need for high-dose postoperative opioids, which are useful in avoiding postoperative hypoxemia and hypercapnia.
We believe that with proper anesthesia management, laparoscopic surgery can be a viable option for noncardiac surgery in patients with ES.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable due to patient privacy concerns.
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Cardiac index
- CO:
-
Cardiac output
- ECG:
-
Electrocardiography
- ES:
-
Eisenmenger syndrome
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- PCV-VG:
-
Pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed
- PEEP:
-
Positive end-expiratory pressure
- PETCO2 :
-
End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure
- PIP:
-
Peak inspiratory pressure
- PVR:
-
Pulmonary vascular resistance
- RR:
-
Respiratory rate
- SV:
-
Stroke volume
- SVR:
-
Systemic vascular resistance
- TEE:
-
Transesophageal echocardiography
- TTE:
-
Transthoracic echocardiography
- VCV:
-
Volume-controlled ventilation
References
Lumley J, Whitwam JG, Morgan M. General anesthesia in the presence of Eisenmenger’s syndrome. Anesth Analg. 1977;56:543–7.
Ammash NM, Connolly HM, Abel MD, Warnes CA. Noncardiac surgery in Eisenmenger syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:222–7.
Bennett JM, Ehrenfeld JM, Markham L, Eagle SS. Anesthetic management and outcomes for patients with pulmonary hypertension and intracardiac shunts and Eisenmenger syndrome: a review of institutional experience. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:286–93.
Cannesson M, Earing MG, Collange V, Kersten JR. Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in adults with congenital heart disease. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:432–40.
Atkinson TM, Giraud GD, Togioka BM, Jones DB, Cigarroa JE. Cardiovascular and ventilatory consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Circulation. 2017;135:700–10.
Sammut MS, Paes ML. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with Eisenmenger’s syndrome. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79:810–2.
Ngan Kee WD, Lee SW, Ng FF, Tan PE, Khaw KS. Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:736–45.
McGlothlin D, Ivascu N, Heerdt PM. Anesthesia and pulmonary hypertension. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;55:199–217.
Schick V, Dusse F, Eckardt R, Kerkhoff S, Commotio S, Hinkelbein J, Mathes A. Comparison of volume-guaranteed or -targeted, pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1276.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YM wrote and revised the manuscript. NK, AK, and KT conducted the intraoperative anesthetic management. NK, HY, and RK revised the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maeda, Y., Kakuta, N., Kasai, A. et al. Successful intraoperative management of laparoscopic hysterectomy in a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome: a case report. JA Clin Rep 10, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00700-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00700-9