Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Negative pressure pulmonary edema in a 2-month-old infant after general anesthesia: a case report

To the Editor,

We report a rare case of negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) following extubation in a 2-month-old male infant (height 60.5 cm, weight 5.0 kg). Born full-term and healthy, he developed vomiting a week prior to admission. Diagnosed with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, he underwent pyloromyotomy on his 2-month birthday. On entering the operating room, stomach contents were aspirated using an indwelling gastric tube. Following rapid sequence induction with propofol 20 mg, fentanyl 15 μg, and rocuronium 5 mg, a smooth and successful first-attempt intubation was achieved using a 3.5 mm uncuffed tube and a video laryngoscope (Airway Scope; Pentax), obtaining a Cormack-Lehane grade of 1. No laryngeal anatomical abnormalities were noted. An air leak at 20 cmH2O was confirmed. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and rocuronium. After confirming adequate recovery from neuromuscular blockade via sugammadex through quantitative neuromuscular monitoring and ensuring adequate spontaneous ventilation, the patient was extubated post-surgery. After extubation, the patient exhibited increased inspiratory effort accompanied by inspiratory stridor and paradoxical chest and abdominal movements. Shortly afterward, SpO2 dropped to below 70% and heart rate decreased to 75 beats/min. Despite manual ventilation using an oral airway with 100% O2 and continuous positive airway pressure (PAP), SpO2 did not improve, leading to suspicion of laryngospasm. After propofol and atropine was administered, SpO2 increased to above 98%, but coarse crackles were detected in both lungs, and a pink frothy fluid was noted in the mouth. A subsequent X-ray showed bilateral diffuse pulmonary infiltration (Fig. 1A), leading to a diagnosis of NPPE. The patient was re-intubated with a 3.5 mm uncuffed tube. Laryngeal swelling and erythema were observed, and blood-tinged frothy sputum was suctioned from the trachea. A post-reintubation X-ray showed decreased diffuse pulmonary infiltration (Fig. 1B). Subsequently, the patient was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and ventilated with bilevel PAP (FiO2 0.3; inspiratory/expiratory PAP 16/4 cmH2O). The blood gas analysis showed the following: pH 7.357, PaO2 109 mmHg, PaCO2 42.5 mmHg, and HCO3− 23.8 mEq/L. Dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg was administered thrice at 6-h intervals, leading to extubation 17 h post-PICU admission. After extubation, he received high-flow nasal cannula (FiO2 0.25; 10 L/min) for 12 h before ceasing oxygen administration. He moved to the general ward on postoperative day 2 and was discharged uneventfully on day 4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Chest radiograph obtained in the operating room 15 min after extubation, showing bilateral diffuse pulmonary infiltration. B Chest radiograph 9 min after re-intubation, showing an improvement in diffuse pulmonary infiltration

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of NPPE in a 2-month-old infant with no pre-existing respiratory tract diseases, occurring due to upper airway obstruction following extubation. The case illustrates that postextubation NPPE can occur even in infants, not just in older children and adults capable of generating larger negative intrathoracic pressure. While NPPE typically resolves within 12–48 h with appropriate early intervention, 11–40% of NPPE cases can become severe [1,2,3]. Therefore, the prevention of NPPE is crucial. Further research is needed to investigate the extent to which factors potentially affecting post-extubation stridor or laryngospasm—such as the choice between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes, or the use of sugammadex—impact the incidence of NPPE [4,5,6,7].

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this report are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen concentration

NPPE:

Negative pressure pulmonary edema

PAP:

Positive airway pressure

PICU:

Pediatric intensive care unit

SpO2 :

Oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry

References

  1. Thiagarajan RR, Laussen PC. Negative pressure pulmonary edema in children–pathogenesis and clinical management. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17:307–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemyze M, Mallat J. Understanding negative pressure pulmonary edema. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1140–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya M, Kallet RH, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Negative-pressure pulmonary edema. Chest. 2016;150:927–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss M, Dullenkopf A, Fischer JE, Keller C, Gerber AC. Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:867–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi F, Xiao Y, Xiong W, Zhou Q, Huang X. Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in children: a meta-analysis. J Anesth. 2016;30:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kao CL, Kuo CY, Su YK, Hung KC. Incidence of negative-pressure pulmonary edema following sugammadex administration during anesthesia emergence: a pilot audit of 27,498 general anesthesia patients and literature review. J Clin Anesth. 2020;62:109728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bibl K, Pracher L, Küng E, Wagner M, Roesner I, Berger A, et al. Incidence of post-extubation stridor in infants with cuffed vs. Uncuffed endotracheal tube: a retrospective cohort analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YM, YT, CM, EA, and FY were involved in the clinical care of the patient. YM wrote the original draft of the manuscript. YT, CM, EA, and FY gave advice to revise the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Miyazaki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient for the publication of this letter and the accompanying image.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyazaki, Y., Taniguchi, Y., Miyazaki, C. et al. Negative pressure pulmonary edema in a 2-month-old infant after general anesthesia: a case report. JA Clin Rep 9, 79 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-023-00670-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-023-00670-4