Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Is meningomyelocele an absolute contraindication for epidural labor analgesia?

To the Editor,

Meningomyelocele, a type of spina bifida , is widely recognized as a relative contraindication for neuraxial anesthesia. Many anesthesiologists are unwilling to provide epidural anesthesia to patients with a history of meningomyelocele repair. However, it remains uncertain whether such patients must forsake lumbar epidural labor analgesia in case of pregnancy.

A 30-year-old primipara pregnant woman presented to our hospital hoping for epidural labor analgesia after being denied by two other major perinatal centers. She had a history of sacral meningomyelocele that had been repaired at the age of 6 months. Although she had used clean intermittent catheterization since childhood for neurogenic bladder, she was able to lead a normal daily life and was working as a nurse. Her neurological status was unremarkable except for a slight reduction of sensation in the anal and buttock areas. A lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the following: (1) The spinal cord did not end in a conus medullaris but was elongated and tethered to the sacral subdermal lipoma, and (2) normal epidural space was preserved in the lumbar region (Fig. 1). We assessed that epidural anesthesia could be safely performed; however, spinal anesthesia would need to be avoided to prevent spinal cord injury. At present, our hospital offers only daytime epidural labor analgesia. After discussion with the patient and her husband, she was scheduled for planned induction of labor with epidural analgesia at 38 weeks of pregnancy. We also fully discussed the anesthesia plans for possible cesarean section and confirmed her desire to try epidural anesthesia if the degree of urgency permitted, not general anesthesia from the beginning, in case emergency cesarean section was required.

Fig. 1
figure 1

MRI scan of the lumbosacral region. The spinal cord is elongated and tethered to the sacral subdermal lipoma. Normal epidural space is preserved in the lumbar region

Ultimately, epidural labor analgesia was not provided because the patient’s labor spontaneously started during midnight and progressed very smoothly, and she delivered the baby by the morning. However, she was satisfied with our management plan for offering epidural labor analgesia and expressed a desire to use it for her next childbirth.

Several cases of successful use of epidural labor analgesia in parturients with repaired meningomyelocele have been reported [1,2,3,4]. However, difficulty of performing an epidural can vary depending on the extent of the spinal lesion and the associated corrective surgery [2, 4], potentially increasing the risk of an inadvertent dural puncture. Furthermore, there might be an increased possibility of poor sacral spread of local anesthetics or an asymmetrical block [2].

An increasing number of parturients are requesting epidural labor analgesia in Japan. Those with a history of meningomyelocele repair should not be routinely denied epidural labor analgesia; however, the feasibility of the procedure should be determined on a case-by-case basis with the aid of MRI data.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Magnetic resonance imaging


  1. Vaagenes P, Fjaerestad I. Epidural block during labour in a patient with spina bifida cystica. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:299–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tidmarsh MD, May AE. Epidural anaesthesia and neural tube defects. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:111–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Altamimi Y, Pavy TJ. Epidural analgesia for labour in a patient with a neural tube defect. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:816–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yakhup A, Okada H, Kawagoe I, Sumikura H. Anesthesia outcomes of pregnant women with spinal diseases: a single-center case-series study. JA Clin Rep. 2023;9:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Editage ( for English language editing.


The authors received no financial support for this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MB wrote the manuscript, and KU helped revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiko Bougaki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bougaki, M., Uchida, K. Is meningomyelocele an absolute contraindication for epidural labor analgesia?. JA Clin Rep 9, 74 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: