- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Unexpected tachycardia and hypertension during anesthetic induction with remimazolam in cardiac surgery: a case report
JA Clinical Reports volume 7, Article number: 58 (2021)
To the Editor
Remimazolam, which is a short-acting benzodiazepine, has been available for general anesthesia in Japan [1, 2]. Previous clinical trials showed that the incident rate of intraoperative hypotension during general anesthesia with remimazolam was lower than that with propofol, while the efficacy of general anesthesia with remimazolam and that with propofol in non-cardiac surgery were comparable . Thus, the effects of remimazolam on hemodynamics may be different from those of existing anesthetics. In this case report, we describe a case in which unexpected tachycardia and hypertension occurred during anesthetic induction using remimazolam in cardiac anesthesia.
A 53-year-old man (161 cm, 83.6 kg) who had severe aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation due to a bicuspid aortic valve was scheduled for aortic valve replacement and ascending aortic replacement. He had no history and was not taking any medication.
Baseline blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were 143/90 mmHg and 74 bpm with sinus rhythm, respectively. General anesthesia was induced by 6 mg/kg/h remimazolam, 100 μg fentanyl, and 0.15 μg/kg/min remifentanil. After loss of consciousness, the dose of remimazolam was decreased to 1 mg/kg/h and rocuronium (0.8 mg/kg) was administered. Although manual mask ventilation was performed without difficulty and BIS value was 46 to 62 during ventilation, HR gradually increased from 72 to 103 bpm, and BP also increased from 115/59 mmHg to 157/86 mmHg (Fig. 1). At that time, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration was 35–40 mmHg, and there was no problem with the intravenous line for administration of remimazolam (e.g., occlusion, formation of a precipitation, extravasation). We discontinued remimazolam and started administration of sevoflurane, suspecting that remimazolam was responsible for adrenergic responses. After the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration reached 1.5%, HR and BP decreased to 84 bpm and 115/61 mmHg, respectively, and the BIS value was 46. The patient was intubated about 7 min after administration of rocuronium. After the anesthetic agent had been changed from remimazolam to sevoflurane during anesthetic induction and propofol was administered during cardiopulmonary bypass, there were no unexpected hemodynamic changes throughout the anesthetic period. Surgical procedures were completed successfully. There was no peri-anesthetic awareness and/or recall that could have induced adrenergic responses.
Discussion and conclusions
We experienced unexpected tachycardia and hypertension during anesthetic induction using remimazolam in a cardiac surgical patient, although remimazolam was used according to the instructions in the package insert.
We believe that intraoperative awareness did not occur in this case because BIS values were appropriate during the occurrence of adrenergic responses. However, the validity of BIS in anesthesia with benzodiazepines has been controversial [3, 4]. Therefore, intraoperative awareness without recall or agitation via inadequate anesthetic depth might have induced the adrenergic responses. Other factors including hypercapnia, stress of manual mask ventilation, and/or the effects of remimazolam on the autonomic nervous system might also have contributed to the adrenergic responses in this case.
Further accumulation of clinical studies and reports on remimazolam would be desirable to increase the clinical reliability of remimazolam for general anesthesia.
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, N.H., upon reasonable request.
Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, Sakamoto A, Yamakage M, Suzuki T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. J Anesth. 2020;34:543–53.
Doi M, Hirata N, Suzuki T, Morisaki H, Morimatsu H, Sakamoto A. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patient (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial. J Anesth. 2020;34:491–501.
Miyake W, Oda Y, Ikeda Y, et al. Electroencephalographic response following midazolam-induced general anesthesia: relationship to plasma and effect-site midazolam concentrations. J Anesth. 2010;24:386–93.
Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:836–47.
The authors have not received money, gifts, or other compensation from any organization, institution, or business that may be affected financially by our publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.
There are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, T., Ohno, S., Maeda, M. et al. Unexpected tachycardia and hypertension during anesthetic induction with remimazolam in cardiac surgery: a case report. JA Clin Rep 7, 58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-021-00462-8
- Cardiac surgery
- Adrenergic response