Skip to main content

Dislodged cranial bone due to application of a MAYFIELD™ skull clamp in a patient with a previous history of craniotomy

To the Editor,

The MAYFIELD™ three-pin skull clamp (MAYFIELD™, OHWA TSUSHO CO., LTD., Tokyo, Japan) allows excellent cranial stabilization during head and neck surgery. However, potentially serious and/or life-threatening complications, such as scalp lacerations and depressed skull fractures, can rarely occur [1,2,3]. We encountered dislodgement of a cranial bone caused by a skull clamp in a patient with a previous history of craniotomy.

A 53-year-old male (height 163 cm, weight 90 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status II) was scheduled to undergo posterior cervical spinal fusion. He had undergone craniotomy 20 years earlier, but no precise details could be obtained. After induction of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, a skull clamp was applied on the safe zones of the temporal region [3] with an indicator to notify the screwing power to the operator (appropriate pressure could be maintained with the standard 60-lb torque screw), and the patient was placed in the prone position on a Jackson spinal table (MIZUHO Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The surgery lasted for 328 min and the patient’s hemodynamic/respiratory status was stable. Skull deformity in the left temporal region was noted after removal of the drapes following surgery. Skull X-ray revealed that bilateral parietal regions had been replaced with artificial bone, which was loosely fixed to the left temporal region of the patient’s skull, and the artificial bone was dislodged by the skull clamp (Fig. 1). Resultantly, open reduction and fixation of the skull were performed. The total anesthesia time was 687 min. The patient regained consciousness at the completion of surgery and was extubated the following day. His subsequent clinical course was uneventful.

Fig. 1
figure1

Skull X-ray and CT images. a Coronal view and b sagittal view X-ray image showing dislodgement of the left temporal region of the skull (white arrows) and the artificial cranial bones (black arrows) loosely fixed to the patient’s skull. c Coronal view and d transverse view CT image showing dislodgement of the skull (white allows)

Depressed skull fracture is one of the most serious complications that can arise from the application of skull clamps that could be prevented by placing the skull pins outside the areas of thin cranial bone (temporal squama, frontal sinus, and coronal suture) [1]. Although CT is not routinely performed in adults before spinal surgery, in our patient, the skull had been partially replaced with an artificial bone that had not been sufficiently firmly fixed (Fig. 1), and compression by the skull clamp led to skull dislodgement in this patient. Fortunately, there was no brain damage. For appropriate head pin fixation in a patient with a history of cranial surgery, the condition of the skull should be precisely evaluated prior to any future surgery, e.g., by a preoperative head CT. In addition, we should also have observed the intraoperative skull position more carefully during the surgery or should have used the horseshoe-type head rest instead, even though head fixation with the latter is inferior to that with a skull clamp.

Our case highlights the need to precisely evaluate the condition of the skull before installing a skull clamp in patients with a previous history of craniotomy.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

References

  1. 1.

    Matouk CC, Ellis MJ, Kalia SK, Ginsberg HJ. Skull fracture secondary to application of a Mayfield skull clamp in an adult patient: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:776–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mohcine S, Brahim el M. Depressed skull fracture secondary to the Mayfield three-pin skull clamp. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beuriat PA, Jacquesson T, Jouanneau E, Berhouma M. Headholders’ - complications in neurosurgery: a review of the literature and recommendations for its use. Neurochirurgie. 2016;62:289–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TO and YO helped in the anesthetic management of the case and wrote the manuscript, wrote the manuscript, responded to the critical comments, and obtained the final approval, and YO is the corresponding author. YM helped in the preparation of the final manuscript, responding to critical comments, and obtaining the final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshimune Osaka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Obtained

Consent for publication

Obtained

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, T., Osaka, Y. & Morita, Y. Dislodged cranial bone due to application of a MAYFIELD™ skull clamp in a patient with a previous history of craniotomy. JA Clin Rep 6, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-020-00319-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dislodged skull
  • MAYFIELD™ skull clamp
  • Spinal surgery