- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
The “wireless” portion of a wire-reinforced endotracheal tube may kink
JA Clinical Reportsvolume 5, Article number: 22 (2019)
To the Editor,
Wire-reinforced endotracheal tubes (WRETs) have a layered structure in which metal wire is embedded in the wall of the tube shaft. This structure makes the tube resistant to kinking caused by angulated forces and improves patient safety . WRETs are useful for head and neck surgery during which kinking of the tube is likely to occur . However, the use of a WRET may be associated with several problems causing the partial or total occlusion of the tube. There are numerous reports of obstruction of WRETs due to dissection of the layered structure [3, 4], patient bite [2, 5], or compression by surgical devices . We herein report a very rare case in which a WRET became kinked and obstructed at its “wireless” portion.
A 74-year-old, 148-cm, 57-kg female patient underwent neck lymph node resection under general anesthesia. A WRET of 7.0 mm in internal diameter (Parker Flex-Tip PFRC tracheal tube, Parker medical, CO, USA) was placed orally. Volume-controlled mechanical ventilation was performed with a tidal volume of 450 ml and a respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute. The neck of the patient was extended, and the respiratory circuit was fixed with a flexible circuit holder (ACOMA, Japan). After covering the patient’s head with surgical drapes, the surgical procedure was started. During the procedure, the surgeon moved the circuit holder to improve his working space. Subsequently, the peak airway pressure gradually increased from 16 cmH2O to a maximum of 28 cmH2O without a marked change in the waveform of capnography, increase in end-tidal CO2, or decrease in SpO2. The tidal volume setting was reduced from 450 to 390 ml, which resulted in a decrease in the peak airway pressure to 18 cmH2O. The surgical procedure was not aborted and was finished uneventfully. After the removal of the surgical drapes, kinking of the tube causing obstruction was observed (Fig. 1). The patient recovered from general anesthesia without complications.
In certain types of WRETs, there is a “wireless” portion of a few millimeters between the end of the embedded coiled wire in the tube and the tip of the plastic slip joint (Fig. 2a). Kinking occurs when an angulated force is applied at this “wireless” portion (Fig. 2b). We measured the length of the “wireless” portion in Parker Flex-Tip PFRC tracheal tubes of 7.0 mm in internal diameter. We chose 10 tubes randomly from the stock in our hospital. The length of the “wireless” portion ranged from 0.4 to 2.1 mm. In our case, the length of the “wireless” portion was 1.7 mm, which was within the range for this type of tube. Moreover, the tube kinked with an angulated force that was not applied directly to the tube. Thus, kinking of WRETs may occur in clinical situations.
Certain types of WRETs have a “wireless” portion that potentially causes kinking of the tube. The endotracheal tube must be kept at an adequate angle to avoid kinking, even when using a wire-reinforced tube.
Wire-reinforced endotracheal tube
Hosseinzadeh N, Samadi S, Jafari Javid M, Takzare A. Impending complete airway obstruction from a reinforced orotracheal tube: a case report. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53:590–2.
Eipe N, Choudhrie A, Pillai AD, Choudhrie R. Neck contracture release and reinforced tracheal tube obstruction. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1911–2.
Rao GS, Ali Z, Ramkiran S, Chandrasekhar HS. The dissection of a reinforced endotracheal tube causing near-fatal intraoperative airway obstruction. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1624–5.
Itani O, Mallat C, Jazzar M, Hammoud R, Shaaban J. Obstruction of a non-resterilized reinforced endotracheal tube during craniotomy under general anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2015;9:260–2.
Ball JE, Platt S. Obstruction of a reinforced oral tracheal tube. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:699–700.
Availability of data and materials
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.