Factors associated with anesthetic satisfaction after cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia

JA Clinical Reports

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression model for the satisfied group

	Odds ratio	95% CI	p value
All patients (n = 813)
CSEA	3.3	1.08–10.1	0.035
Paresthesia during needle insertion	0.56	0.42–0.76	< 0.001
Lightning pain	0.62	0.39–0.98	0.043
Failed block	0.28	0.09–0.87	0.028
Antiemetic	0.71	0.53–0.94	0.019
Spinal anesthesia patients (n = 792)
Paresthesia during needle insertion	0.55	0.41–0.74	< 0.001
Lightning pain	0.62	0.39–0.97	0.04
Failed block	0.28	0.09–0.87	0.028
Antiemetic	0.71	0.53–0.95	0.021

In all patients, discrimination of the final model assessed by the likelihood ratio test was significant (p < 0.001). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not reject a logistic regression model fit (p = 0.96). The explanatory model based on these variables had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58–0.66). No value exceeded the expected value by 3 ± standard deviation
In the spinal anesthesia patients, discrimination of the final model assessed by the likelihood ratio test was significant (p < 0.001). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not reject a logistic regression model fit (p = 0.96). The explanatory model based on these variables had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58–0.66). No such value exceeded the expected value by 3 ± standard deviation
CSEA combined spinal–epidural anesthesia, CI confidence interval