Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression model for the satisfied group

From: Factors associated with anesthetic satisfaction after cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia

  Odds ratio 95% CI p value
All patients (n = 813)
 CSEA 3.3 1.08–10.1 0.035
 Paresthesia during needle insertion 0.56 0.42–0.76 < 0.001
 Lightning pain 0.62 0.39–0.98 0.043
 Failed block 0.28 0.09–0.87 0.028
 Antiemetic 0.71 0.53–0.94 0.019
Spinal anesthesia patients (n = 792)
 Paresthesia during needle insertion 0.55 0.41–0.74 < 0.001
 Lightning pain 0.62 0.39–0.97 0.04
 Failed block 0.28 0.09–0.87 0.028
 Antiemetic 0.71 0.53–0.95 0.021
  1. In all patients, discrimination of the final model assessed by the likelihood ratio test was significant (p < 0.001). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not reject a logistic regression model fit (p = 0.96). The explanatory model based on these variables had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58–0.66). No value exceeded the expected value by 3 ± standard deviation
  2. In the spinal anesthesia patients, discrimination of the final model assessed by the likelihood ratio test was significant (p < 0.001). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not reject a logistic regression model fit (p = 0.96). The explanatory model based on these variables had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58–0.66). No such value exceeded the expected value by 3 ± standard deviation
  3. CSEA combined spinal–epidural anesthesia, CI confidence interval