Anesthetic management of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma for patients with Fontan circulation: a case series

Abstract

Background

Anesthetic management of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with Fontan circulation is challenging for physicians, with attention to cardiovascular physiology.

Case presentation

We performed anesthetic management for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in three patients with Fontan circulation. We maintained intraoperative central venous pressure at preoperative level under fluid infusion and administrating nitric oxide to decrease pulmonary arterial resistance. We administered noradrenaline or vasopressin if low blood pressure was present despite adequate central venous pressure. Although noradrenaline is prevalent for the case of noradrenaline-secreting tumor especially after resection, we could maintain blood pressure to administrate vasopressin without increasing central venous pressure. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach which could avoid intra-abdominal adhesions might be selectable as case 3.

Conclusions

Sophisticated management is required for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with Fontan circulation.

Background

Fontan circulation is an iatrogenic definitive palliative condition for patients with single ventricle physiology. The patient with Fontan circulation can be sensitive and vulnerable to change systemic vascular resistance (SVR), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and inotropy. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (P-PGL) are neuroendocrine tumors with catecholamine hypersecretion. The number of patients with Fontan circulation and P-PGL is expected to increase because survival rate of the patients is improved and P-PGL have a tendency to develop under cyanotic heart disease [1, 2]. Chronic hypoxia exposure followed by aberrant activation of common hypoxia cellular pathways and hypoxia-inducible factors in chromaffin cells appear to mechanism for the pathogenesis of P-PGL [1]. Although several case reports of P-PGL with Fontan circulation have been reported, the information on its perioperative anesthetic management is sparse (online only Supplement) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Case presentation

Patients’ profiles and preoperative data are summarized in Table 1, and intraoperative anesthetic profiles in Table 2.

Table 1 Preoperative characteristics of the three cases

Table 2 Intraoperative profiles of the three cases

Case 1

The patient underwent Fontan surgery at 12 years of age for double outlet right ventricle (DORV), atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD), and pulmonary stenosis (PS). He had a history of a right adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma at 19 years of age. The 24-h urine collection for catecholamines revealed elevated normetanephrine levels of 1.07 [normal range (NR) 0.09–0.33] µg/day and elevated noradrenaline levels of 418.2 (NR 48.6–168.4) µg/day. ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy showed a mass accumulation around the right renal vein at the level of the second lumbar spine and the right side of the abdominal aorta at the level of the third lumbar spine. He was diagnosed with paraganglioma as a local recurrence of pheochromocytoma and scheduled for open tumor resection. He started oral administration of the α₁-adrenergic receptor blocker doxazosin at 1.5 mg/day. His vitals were as follows: blood pressure (BP), 121/81 mmHg; heart rate (HR), 82 beats/min in sinus rhythm; and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) in room air, 97%.

Induction of general anesthesia with fentanyl 8 µg/kg, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg, and rocuronium 1 mg/kg was successful. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 0.6–0.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and remifentanil 0.15–0.4 µg/kg/min. A continuous infusion of nitroglycerin 0.5 µg/kg/min, milrinone 0.25 µg/kg/min, and inhalation of nitric oxide (NO) 10 ppm were administered. We maintained CVP at 10–14 mmHg. We adjusted pressure control ventilation (PCV) to set peak pressure at 14 cmH₂O and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) at 5 cmH₂O. The partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) was maintained at 34–37 mmHg. Despite hemodynamic fluctuations during tumor manipulation (approximately ± 30% in mean arterial pressure and HR compared to before manipulation), the patient was successfully managed with three bolus infusions of nicardipine 0.2 mg and three bolus infusions of landiolol 2.5 mg. We administered a continuous infusion of noradrenaline 0.02–0.05 µg/kg/min to maintain BP after tumor resection. The operation was performed as scheduled.

Case 2

The patient underwent Fontan surgery at 12 years of age due to DORV, AVSD, and PS. He had a medical history of right adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma at 19 and 30 years of age. The 24-h urine collection for catecholamines revealed elevated normetanephrine levels of 1.21 µg/day and noradrenaline levels of 470.3 µg/day. ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy showed mass accumulations around the para-aortic area. He was diagnosed with a local recurrence of paraganglioma and scheduled for open tumor resection. His vitals were as follows: BP, 131/98 mmHg; HR, 85 beats/min; and SpO₂ in room air, 99%.

Induction of general anesthesia with fentanyl 8 µg/kg, midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg was successful. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 0.6–0.8 MAC and remifentanil 0.1–0.2 µg/kg/min. We administered a continuous infusion of milrinone 0.25 µg/kg/min, vasopressin 0.1–1 units/h, and inhalation of NO 10 ppm. We maintained CVP at approximately 15 mmHg. We adjusted PCV with PEEP to maintain a PaCO₂ of 35–40 mmHg. Although hemodynamic fluctuations occurred during the tumor manipulation (approximately ± 20% of the mean BP compared to before manipulation), the patient was successfully managed with two bolus infusions of phenylephrine 0.1 mg and three bolus infusions of nicardipine 0.2 mg. The operation was performed as scheduled.

Case 3

The patient had undergone Fontan surgery at 9 years of age for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and PS. She had a medical history of open tumor resection for paraganglioma at 16 years of age. Although total cavopulmonary connection conversion had been planned, local recurrence of P-PGL was accidentally revealed during the preoperative examination. The 24-h urine collection for catecholamines revealed elevated normetanephrine levels of 0.56 µg/day, noradrenaline levels of 236.6 µg/day, and dopamine levels of 1727.1 (NR 365.0–961.5) µg/day. ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy showed mass accumulations around the right adrenal gland and para-aortic area. Her vitals were as follows: BP, 90/53 mmHg; HR, 65 beats/min; and SpO₂ on O₂ 2 l/min, 88%. Multidisciplinary preoperative discussions were conducted among the medical team consisting of anesthesiologists, cardiologists, surgeons, and endocrinologists. Our team could have consensus as follows. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach might be better than intra-abdominal laparoscopic approach or open-abdominal surgery because of avoiding intra-abdominal adhesions and assuring minimal surgical incision and postoperative course. The operation is conducted under left renal surgical position and modest pneumoperitoneum pressure. Laparoscopic approach is converted to open-abdominal surgery when the circulation deteriorates, or surgical field is interfered by bleeding. She was scheduled for retroperitoneal laparoscopic tumor excision.

General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 8 µg/kg, midazolam 0.11 mg/kg, and rocuronium 1.1 mg/kg. We administered dobutamine 2 µg/kg/min, noradrenaline 0.03–0.12 µg/kg/min, vasopressin 0.5 units/h, and inhalation of NO 10 ppm to maintain hemodynamics after induction of anesthesia. We maintained CVP at approximately 20 mmHg. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 0.6–0.8 MAC and remifentanil 0.1–0.3 µg/kg/min. We adjusted PCV with a low PEEP of 5 mmHg to maintain a PaCO₂ of approximately 35 mmHg. The operation was begun in the left renal position. Her hemodynamics were stable after CO₂ insufflation for the retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure, in which the pneumoperitoneum pressure was set at 6–8 mmHg. Although hemodynamic fluctuations occurred during tumor manipulation (approximately ± 10–20% of the mean BP compared to before manipulation), the patient was successfully managed with four bolus infusions of phenylephrine 0.1 mg. The operation was performed as scheduled.

Discussion

In a Fontan circulation, the pulmonary blood flow is passively determined by a combination of CVP, left atrial pressure, systemic ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and PVR because of the lack of a responsible ventricle for determining pulmonary circulation. In such cases, PVR and intravascular volume must be controlled to maintain pulmonary circulation because Fontan physiology is preload dependent and requires low PVR [8, 13]. In particular, CVP and PVR may be the most important parameters in the perioperative management of Fontan circulation [8, 13,14,15]. We managed intraoperative CVP at preoperative levels under fluid infusion as previous case reports [13, 15] and utilizing NO to decrease PVR in all cases. In addition, we administered noradrenaline or vasopressin to maintain SVR when BP deteriorated even though CVP was maintained. In case 3, we administered dobutamine as BP was not maintained even though the noradrenaline and vasopressin. While we did not administer milrinone to avoid decreasing SVR and increasing HR for a failed Fontan circulation. Bigelow A. M. et al. reported that vasopressin administration was associated with a reduced transpulmonary gradient [16]. Administration of high-dose noradrenaline or phenylephrine might increase PVR [17]. Although high-dose vasopressin also has risk of mesenteric ischemia [18], vasopressin might be a useful vasopressor, and we could manage BP without increasing CVP in cases 2 and 3.

P-PGL are rare neuroendocrine tumors secreting high levels of catecholamines. Hypertensive crises, cardiac arrhythmias, and pulmonary edema are major adverse cardiovascular events that can potentially occur during surgery. Preoperative administration of an α-adrenergic receptor blocker is essential for preventing these adverse events [19]. Suffredini G. et al. and Lee H. C. et al. described methods of controlling hemodynamics during catecholamine surges; catecholamines secreted by P-PGL could cause massive increases in SVR followed by decreased cardiac output [8, 13]. Calcium blockers or β-blockers might be useful, as seen in our cases 1 and 2. Moreover, α-blockers also might be useful to manage hemodynamics during catecholamine surges [20].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of retroperitoneal laparoscopic resection for pheochromocytoma with failing Fontan circulation as case 3. Although the retroperitoneal approach only allows a relatively small operating space with nuclear anatomical landmarks and needs technical skill and experience, its use can help avoid intestinal interference and postoperative intestinal obstruction [21]. In particular, this approach is conducive to completing the operation without interference from intra-abdominal adhesions, as seen in case 3. Laparoscopic surgery is challenging for Fontan physiology because the pneumoperitoneum increases SVR and decreases venous return and cardiac output [8, 12, 14]. Although the pneumoperitoneum pressure was set at 6–8 mmHg, CVP and ABP were stable in our case. Perioperative discussions involving anesthesiologists, cardiologists, surgeons, and endocrinologists are essential in such cases.