Successful clavicle fracture surgery performed under selective supraclavicular nerve block using the new subclavian approach
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 30 August 2016
Accepted: 4 November 2016
Published: 8 November 2016
Cervical nerves block cannot be performed on some patients because of the risk of phrenic nerve paralysis. To overcome this limitation, we discovered the site of selective only supraclavicular nerve block at the subclavian site.
We present the case of a 62-year-old woman with clavicular fracture. We performed a selective block of the supraclavicular nerve and the fifth and sixth cervical nerves for the clavicle fracture surgery.
We can perform selective supraclavicular nerve blocks for clavicular fracture surgery of patients who have bilateral pneumothorax.
KeywordsClavicular fracture Selective only supraclavicular nerve block Cervical plexus nerve block
Occasionally, patients with clavicle fractures also have a pneumothorax. If we induce regional anesthesia without general anesthesia for clavicle fracture surgery, we must relieve the pain of the supraclavicular nerve and the fifth and the sixth cervical nerves (C5 and C6) . A cervical plexus nerve block is usually performed to anesthetize the supraclavicular nerve. In this case, we performed a selective supraclavicular nerve block instead of a cervical plexus nerve block. There have been no reports in literature on the use of a selective supraclavicular nerve block at the subclavian site.
A 62-year-old woman (height, 155 cm; weight, 45 kg), with a fracture of the left clavicle due to a traffic accident, was scheduled to undergo open reduction and internal fixation. She had bilateral pneumothorax and was equipped with chest drains in the bilateral thoracic cavity. In addition, she had been undergoing artificial dialysis for 10 years because of severe renal dysfunction. Considering the potential complications of general anesthesia, we decided to induce only regional anesthesia without general anesthesia.
We had to relieve the pain of the supraclavicular nerve and the fifth and sixth cervical nerves (C5 and C6) for the left clavicle fracture surgery. The most appropriate methods include both a left cervical plexus nerve block and a brachial plexus nerve block. However, since the cervical plexus nerve block is associated with a risk of phrenic nerve paralysis, we opted for a selective supraclavicular nerve block.
In the operating room, the patient was connected to several monitors. We performed the selective C5 and C6 blocks by injecting 0.75 % levobupivacaine (10 mL) around the C5 and C6 between the anterior and middle scalene muscles using a high-frequency linear probe of a LOGIQ e Premium system (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan). After these injections, we confirmed that the local anesthetic did not spread around the fourth, seventh, and eighth nerves by using the LOGIQ e Premium system.
Prior to this case, there have been no reports in literature on the use of a selective supraclavicular nerve block at the subclavian site. Hence, we mainly performed the cervical plexus nerve block to anesthetize the selective supraclavicular nerve. However, as the cervical plexus nerve block may lead to phrenic nerve paralysis, it cannot be performed in patients with bilateral pneumothorax.
Administering a nerve block at the site of the pectoralis major muscle enables the procedure to be performed safely and easily. In addition, we may be able to use this approach for performing selective supraclavicular nerve block in patients with severe complications such as bilateral pneumothorax and hemorrhagic diathesis. In the future, we may be able to perform selective supraclavicular nerve block for perioperative analgesia of patients with such complication. For example, the nerve block may be used effectively in surgeries for clavicle fracture and anterior rib fractures.
There have been no reports in the literature on the use of selective supraclavicular nerve block in clavicle fractures. Therefore, it is uncertain whether adequate anesthetic volumes and concentration would achieve a satisfactory result. In particular, administering a small volume at the site may not be able to block lateral supraclavicular nerves.
In addition, there were no cadaver studies showing the spread of dye or something. Therefore, we must eventually perform some cadaver studies to confirm the spread.
We could perform a selective supraclavicular nerve block using the new subclavian approach instead of a cervical plexus nerve block.
HU is responsible for the study design/planning and wrote the paper. HU and HO revised the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Consents for publication were gained.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Tran DQ, Tiyaprasertkul W, González AP. Analgesia for clavicular fracture and surgery: a call for evidence. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:539–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. Anomaly of the supraclavicular nerve: case report and review of the literature. Clin Anat. 2006;19:599–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valdés-Vilches LF, Sánchez-del Águila MJ. Anesthesia for clavicular fracture: selective supraclavicular nerve block is the key. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:258–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar